Pages

Showing posts with label caffeine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label caffeine. Show all posts

Sunday, March 8, 2015

Caffeine Cholorogenic Acid Anti Obesity Agents from Your Coffee Mug Human Study Reveals Cortisol Lowering Effects Mouse Study Confirms Anti Obesity Effects

Ever since the Vinson study showed that green coffee bean extracts can help overweight women lose weight, green coffee is sexier than roasted one.
Only weeks after Vinson et al. were able to show that "Green Coffee Bean Extract Helps Pre-Obese Men and Women Shed 16lbs in 22 Weeks" (read more), green coffee bean supplements began to swamp the market - a great financial success for the supplement producers, and that despite the fact that follow-up studies that would confirm the amazing effects Vinson et al. report are still lacking. Two recent studies, one from the Queen Margaret University in the UK (Revuelta-Iniesta. 2014), the other from the  Jiangxi Agricultural University in the Peoples Republic of China (Zheng. 2014) could now shed a little more light on the weight loss effects of green coffee beans and the combination of caffeine and cholorgenic acid (CGA), the allegedly most important active ingredient in unroasted, green coffee beans.
There is evidence of beneficial effects of GCA on your gut microbiome (Jaquet. 2009)

Fiber for Female Fat Loss

Sweeteners & Your Gut

Foods, Not Ma- cros for the Gut

Lactulose For Gut & Health

Probiotics Dont Cut Body Fat

The Macrobiotic MaPi2.0 Diet
In their 24-week rodent study, Zhang et al. (2014) tried to elucidate the mechanism by which CGA and caffeine regulate lipid metabolism. To this ends, they randomized their forty hairy subjects to diets containing no CGA or caffeine, CGA, caffeine, or CGA + caffeine.
Figure 1: Rel. (vs. control) body weight changes and liver and intraperitoneal adipose tissue weight (Zhang. 2014)
Over the course of the 24-weeks study, the scientists recorded body weight, intraperitoneal adipose tissue (IPAT) weight, and serum biochemical parameters of the rodents, tracked the the activities and mRNA and protein expression of lipid metabolism-related enzymes and analyzed the effects of caffeine, CGA and the combination of the two. What they found was...
  1. Figure 2: Effects of chlorogenic acid (CGA) and caffeine on the hepatic protein
    expression levels of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), adipose TAG
    lipase (ATGL) and fatty acid synthase (FAS; Zhang. 2014)
    decreases in the body weight and IPAT weight of mice fed the CGA + caffeine diet,
  2. significant decreases in the serum and hepatic concentrations of total cholesterol, TAG and leptin of mice fed the CGA + caffeine diet,
  3. increases of the activity of carnitine acyltransferase (CAT) and acyl-CoA oxidase (ACO), 
  4. decreased levels of fatty acid synthase (FAS) and the respective mRNA levels
  5. significantly upregulated mRNA expression levels of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), CAT and ACO
  6. pronounced reductions of PPARg2
If we group these findings as follows 3 + 5 and 4+6, we could say that they triggered 1 + 2 by (a) increasing the oxidation of fatty acids (3+5) and (b) decreasing the synthesis and storage of fatty acids (4+6) - an observation that could certainly explain the benefits Vinson et al. observed in their human study which has been retracted in October 2014, though. On the other hand, the amount of CGA and caffeine in the rodent diets (0.2 % CGA + 0.03 % caffeine) was quite significant and previous rodent studies on other allegedly promising fat burners were not replicable in human beings either (example: CLA). Against that background its good to have study #2 by R. Revuelta-Iniesta and E. A. S. Al-Dujaili, who investigated the effects of green coffee (GC), rich in chlorogenic acid, and black coffee (BC) on cardiovascular markers.

New human data with surprising results

The researchers designed a randomised pilot crossover study with healthy subjects who consumed both coffees for 2 weeks.
  • The green coffee (GC) used in this project was Ethiopian Harrar 4 (100% Arabica) and the black coffee (BC) was Sainsbury’s Original Blend Cafetitère Coffee.
  • The BC was  a blend of Brazilian, Colombian, Mexican, Nicaraguan, Peruvian, and Rwandan beans.
The study participants were asked to have 40 g of GC and BC per day distributed throughout the day into four cups of coffee. Thus, the scientists tried to ensure that high plasma coffee antioxidant concentrations were maintained over a period of time, "allowing effects to take place and the body to develop tolerance to caffeine, which can take 2-3 days." (Revuelta-Iniesta. 2014).
Table 1: Concentration of total polyphenols and antioxidant capacity determined in GC and BC as compared by the three methods of  coffee preparation (Revuelta-Iniesta. 2014).
The GC beans were grounded to powder using an electric coffee grinder. Instructions on how to make the coffee were provided and the Italian cafetière, the French cafetière, or the filter coffee machine was used to prepare the coffee drink.

The researchers measured anthropometry, blood pressure, and arterial elasticity after each intervention and collected urine samples to monitor antioxidant capacity. The free cortisol and cortisone levels you see in Table 2 were obtained from urine and analysed by specific ELISA methods.
Table 2: Comparison of results obtained (mean±SEM) after 14 days of green coffee vs. black coffee intervention (2-week cross over study); F: cortisol; E: cortisone; orange = almost bordeline significant; green = statist. significant inter-group difference (Revuelta-Iniesta. 2014).
In view of the short duration of the study (remember 2 weeks on each coffee), its not really surprising that we didnt see changes in any of the anthropometric measures. On the other hand, the mere fact that the cortisol/cortisone ratio (indicating 11beta-HSD1 activity) was reduced after GC (from 3.5 +/- 1.9 to 1.7 +/- 1.04, P = 0.002) does not suggest that you will see beneficial effects on body composition in the absence of significant reductions in energy intake. A reduction in glucocorticoid activity can in fact hamper not accelerate weight loss (learn more) and the researchers hypothesis that "GC can play a role in reducing cardiovascular risk factors" (Revuelta-Iniesta. 2014) is a possible, but unconfirmed hypothesis.
Yes, agents like glycerric acid from licorice increase cortisol levels. Contrary to common believe this will yet not trash your testosterone levels and/or induce weight loss - quite the contrary | learn more
Bottom line: While the rodent study by Zhang et al. appears to support the accuracy of the data Vinson et al. published two years ago, you as a SuppVersity reader should be aware of the fact that the reduction in cortisol / cortisone activity Revuelta-Iniesta and Al-Dujaili observed in their subjects is not necessarily going to facilitate weight loss. As discussed in the corresponding Science Round Up, a normal circadian cortisol rhythm with both spikes and troughs is a prerequisite of optimal fat loss, so that its suppression by green coffee beans or other means is beneficial only for those of us who suffer from chronically elevated cortisol levels.

Overall, we are thus left with a single study the whole "green coffee bean for weight loss"-hype is based on. Well, who cares. For the majority of best-selling supplements we dont even have that ;-)
References:
  • Jaquet, Muriel, et al. "Impact of coffee consumption on the gut microbiota: a human volunteer study." International journal of food microbiology 130.2 (2009): 117-121.
  • Revuelta-Iniesta, R., and E. A. S. Al-Dujaili. "Consumption of Green Coffee Reduces Blood Pressure and Body Composition by Influencing 11β-HSD1 Enzyme Activity in Healthy Individuals: A Pilot Crossover Study Using Green and Black Coffee." BioMed Research International 2014 (2014).
  • Vinson, Joe A., Bryan R. Burnham, and Mysore V. Nagendran. "Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, linear dose, crossover study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a green coffee bean extract in overweight subjects." Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity: targets and therapy 5 (2012): 21.
  • Zheng, et al. "Chlorogenic acid and caffeine in combination inhibit fat accumulation by regulating hepatic lipid metabolism-related enzymes in mice." British Journal of Nutrition (2014). Ahead of Print.
Read more »

Thursday, March 5, 2015

Nitrates Caffeine An Ergogenic Sledgehammer For High Intensity Cycling 46 Improved Time Trial Performance

You better make sure you are competing in / training for the right sports before you spend you get all excited about a 46% performance increase
After the initial excitement was over, it has gotten quiet in the "nitrate" section of the supplement stores - no excited crys, no customers willing to pay whatever it takes, just to get a bottle of the "next big thing".

Personally, Id say that this is mostly a result of the disappointment of users of the mostly extremely underdosed "nitrate supplements" experienced. The not exactly earth-shattering effect sizes that have been reported in many of the more recent studies were are another factor... the 46% increase in time-trial performance and the albeit non-significant 27% difference to the caffeine-only trial, on the other hand, has the potential to rekindle the interest of any athlete for whom longer duration high intensity work at 80% of his / her individual VO2max doesnt sound like HIIT gone wrong ;-)

Whatever, ... the big news is that the effects add up perfectly

Within the health and fitness community people are always on the lookout for new pills to pop. If you look at the "regimen" some of them post on pertinent bulletin boards, you sometimes have to scratch your head and ask yourself, whether this guys & gals even eat anything else but supps.
Dosing recommendations: Well, I guess without a control its a bit premature to provide actual "recommendation", but if you want to reproduce the effects, Handzlik and Gleeson observed in their 14 healthy well-trained 22 ± 3 year-old male subjects, youd have to drink 70 mL concentrated beetroot juice (the brand in the study was Beet-It - see image to the left; 0.4g of dietary nitrate per 70ml shot; note: the authors declare no conflict of interest!) for breakfast, and 70 min later another 70ml of the same juice + 0.5mg/kg caffeine. Another 75 min later you are ready to roll, cycle or whatever youre up to.
Something that is commonly overlooked, though, is that in the world of dietary supplements the simple equation "1+1" usually aint "2" - in 85% of the cases the result will be somewhere between "1" and "2". In 9% the effects will be less pronounced than with the administration of a single agent. In another 5% youre lucky and the compounds display a special synergy so that "1+1" isnt just "2", but actually "2.x". And, lastly, there is this 1% of the cases, where "1+1" is actually "2".

Figure 1: Ratings of perceived exertion at 80% ̇ VO2max, left; total time trial performance (cycling at 80% VO2max to exhaustion) in s, right (Handzlik. 2013)
As you can see in Figure 1 the study at hand is actually one of these rare 1% of supplement studies, where "1+1=2" is a true statement; and it is also one of those studies that could help nitrate supplements to return to the focus of attention, if people realized that they are no pump supplements and that their usefulness for strength athletes and bodybuilders appears somewhat questionable. I for my part, would at least be surprised to see a strongman cycling like mad for 30 minutes... but I guess, principle neither rule #2 nor any of the other "Simple Rules of Sensible Supplementation" will ever be heard by the confirmed supplement junkies (learn more).
If this looks only remotely familiar, you are probably not following the "Three Simple Rules of Sensible Supplementation" | learn more
Bottom line: It goes without saying, the effects Michal K. Handzlik and Michael Gleeson report in their most recent paper are pretty outstanding. On the other hand, its not what the majority of the initially mentioned disappointed customers were looking for, when they bought their underdosed nitrate-based NO-boosters.

In other words, unless you are aware that the benefits Handzlik and Gleeson observed in their fourteen well-trained male subjects wont necessarily be useful, maybe not even noticeable unless you practice sports where HIT (without the 2nd "I" for interval) is part of the training or even competition.
References:
  • Handzlik, M. K., & Gleeson, M. (2013). Likely Additive Ergogenic Effects of Combined Preexercise Dietary Nitrate and Caffeine Ingestion in Trained Cyclists. ISRN Nutrition, 2013.
Read more »